<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Glitec Loans &#187; competition commission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/tag/competition-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glitec.co.uk</link>
	<description>Loans, Mortgages and Debt Help</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Borrowers could be at greater risk due to PPI ban</title>
		<link>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2010/05/borrowers-could-be-at-greater-risk-due-to-ppi-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2010/05/borrowers-could-be-at-greater-risk-due-to-ppi-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 16:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Loan News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment protection insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glitec.co.uk/?p=1897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week the Competition Commission announced that it was banning the sale of Payment Protection Insurance or PPI at point of sale in order to try and increase competition and reduce the cost of this type of cover, which has been causing controversy for some years. This was a provisional decision from the Competition Commission, [...]<p><a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/2010/05/borrowers-could-be-at-greater-risk-due-to-ppi-ban/">Borrowers could be at greater risk due to PPI ban</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk">Glitec</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week the Competition Commission announced that it was banning the sale of Payment Protection Insurance or PPI at point of sale in order to try and increase competition and reduce the cost of this type of cover, which has been causing controversy for some years. This was a provisional decision from the Competition Commission, and was welcomed by many.</p>
<p>However, one industry official has expressed concern that this ban on PPI at point of sale could actually adversely affect some customers, as it could mean that they are left unprotected and uncovered should anything go wrong. Finance journalist Lorna Bourke said that Britons could be left at greater risk as a result of this ban because they would have no cover in place.</p>
<p>The Competition Commission has already tried to ban PPI in the past, but some of the major banks appealed against this and their appeal was upheld. The ban on point of sale PPI could affect customers who do not bother or think about taking protection out elsewhere but will also affect the lenders themselves who could lose out because of the ban.</p>
<p>PPI is designed to cover repayments for the policyholder for a set period of time in the event that they cannot make repayments due to sickness, injury, or redundancy. However, these policies hit the headlines after investigations showed that the policies had often been mis-sold to those that did not want them, did not need them, and in some cases were not even eligible to claim on them.</p>
<blockquote><p>Ms Bourke stated: &#8220;There is a real danger that banning all PPI policies sold alongside a mortgage or personal loan could result in borrowers having no protection at all. This could mean homebuyers losing their homes if they are unable to meet repayments.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/2010/05/borrowers-could-be-at-greater-risk-due-to-ppi-ban/">Borrowers could be at greater risk due to PPI ban</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk">Glitec</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2010/05/borrowers-could-be-at-greater-risk-due-to-ppi-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPI with loans to be banned</title>
		<link>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2009/03/ppi-with-loans-to-be-banned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2009/03/ppi-with-loans-to-be-banned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Loan News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of British Insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment protection insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glitec.co.uk/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials from the Competition Commission have recently confirmed that the sale of the controversial insurance cover known as Payment Protection Insurance or PPI is to be banned in 2010.
Once the ban on the sale of the cover has been put into place lenders will no longer be able to sell this cover alongside credit agreements. [...]<p><a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/2009/03/ppi-with-loans-to-be-banned/">PPI with loans to be banned</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk">Glitec</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Officials from the Competition Commission have recently confirmed that the sale of the controversial insurance cover known as Payment Protection Insurance or PPI is to be banned in 2010.<span id="more-808"></span></p>
<p>Once the ban on the sale of the cover has been put into place lenders will no longer be able to sell this cover alongside credit agreements. The <a title="Competition Commission" href="http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/">Competition Commission</a> has also reduced the amount of time that lenders must wait before contacting customers to see if they want the cover, from fourteen days to seven days.</p>
<p>As part of the rules consumers will be able to contact the lenders themselves within twenty four hours if they wish to take out the cover, which is designed to cover repayments on a debt for a specified period in the event that the borrower cannot make repayments due to sickness, injury, or redundancy. Single premium PPI sales will also be banned under the rules, and this is where the cost of the cover is taken as a lump sum and added to the loan, which means that the borrower has to pay interest on it.</p>
<p>However, the <a title="Association of British Insurers" href="http://www.abi.org.uk/">Association of British Insurers</a> has expressed concern that the ban on PPI could cause problems for many borrowers, particularly given the current economic and financial climate, where many were concerned about losing their jobs. PPI has been under fire for some years after investigations revealed that it was being mis-sold in a number of ways, and often consumers were being forced into taking the cover or having it added to their credit without even being told.</p>
<blockquote><p>One official from the Competition Commission said that the measures had been put into place to protect consumers. He said: &#8216;Consumers&#8217; interests are not best served when the only choice the vast majority have is whether or not to purchase their credit provider&#8217;s PPI product. The resulting lack of competition means that the only offer consumers get is simply worse value than they are entitled to expect.&#8217;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/2009/03/ppi-with-loans-to-be-banned/">PPI with loans to be banned</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk">Glitec</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2009/03/ppi-with-loans-to-be-banned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOS still cracking down on loan insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2008/10/fos-still-cracking-down-on-loan-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2008/10/fos-still-cracking-down-on-loan-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Loan News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial ombudsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glitec.co.uk/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the subject of loan insurance, otherwise known as Payment Protection Insurance or PPI, has been at the centre of heated controversy for some time, this product still continues to attract complaints from customers and concerns from a variety of industry professionals. In fact, the UK&#8217;s financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority, and the Financial [...]<p><a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/2008/10/fos-still-cracking-down-on-loan-insurance/">FOS still cracking down on loan insurance</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk">Glitec</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the subject of loan insurance, otherwise known as Payment Protection Insurance or PPI, has been at the centre of heated controversy for some time, this product still continues to attract complaints from customers and concerns from a variety of industry professionals. In fact, the UK&#8217;s financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority, and the Financial Ombudsman Service are continuing to crack down when it comes to PPI, having already imposed sky high fines on some lenders and companies that have been found to have been mis-selling this form of cover.<span id="more-359"></span></p>
<p>PPI is offered with financial products such as <a title="loans" href="http://www.glitec.co.uk">loans</a>, credit cards, car finance, etc. The purpose of the cover is to provide peace of mind for the consumer, who is told that in the event that they are unable to make repayments on the loan or finance due to sickness, redundancy, or accident the repayments will be covered for a set period of time, giving them time to get back on their feet.</p>
<p>However, concern arose when it was discovered that some lenders or providers were selling <a title="PPI" href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/2008/03/should-you-consider-payment-protection-insurance/">PPI</a> to those that did not even qualify for it, and in some cases were either hard-selling this costly cover or were adding it without the knowledge of the consumer. Over the past couple of years authorities have been addressing such issues in relation to PPI, and regulations over the sale of PPI have become far more stringent.</p>
<p>Recent reports indicate, however, that the <a href="http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/ ">FOS</a> is still receiving around five hundred complaints a week in relation to PPI, and this has prompted a further probe by the agency. The FOS has now written to the FSA in order to get a more indepth investigation underway, and has expressed concern that many lenders and providers are failing to take problems and issues relating to PPI sales seriously enough.</p>
<p>There are concerns amongst FOS officials that the PPI market, which is said to be worth £5.5 billion a year, is getting out of control, with around two million people thought to have been mis-sold this type of cover over the past five years. Even the <a title="Competition Commission" href="http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/">Competition Commission</a> has become involved in the issues relating to PPI sales, yet even with three major authorities in the financial world involved in this clampdown the issues and problems continue to arise.</p>
<p>Industry watchdogs have also raised concerns over the fact that some customers have been led to believe that PPI is compulsory, when in fact it is totally optional. Around 1.3 million people are thought to have taken PPI with credit cards under the impression that they had to take out the cover in order to get the credit that they wanted. Past investigations have shown that this is the impression that some lenders have been giving to customers without actually saying as much.</p>
<p>It is thought that if the <a title="FSA" href="http://www.fsa.gov.uk">FSA </a>does decide to investigate further this could result in an industry-wide review and could result in forced changes to the sale of PPI.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk/2008/10/fos-still-cracking-down-on-loan-insurance/">FOS still cracking down on loan insurance</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.glitec.co.uk">Glitec</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.glitec.co.uk/2008/10/fos-still-cracking-down-on-loan-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
